We seldom legislate new technologies into being. They emerge, and we plunge with them into whatever vortices of change they generate. We legislate after the fact, in a perpetual game of catch-up, as best we can, while our new technologies redefine us - as surely and perhaps as terribly as we've been redefined by broadcast television.
Yeah well, if you really want a political rant: (NTY article)
"The discipline is one of a number - like high-energy physics and aspects of space science - where Europeans have recently come from behind to seize the initiative, dismaying some American experts."
Maybe its because Clinton killed the SSC, while CERN has all kinds of shiny new toys, and Bush has whacked the hard-science budget at the NSF and NASA to nearly nothing. Government spending on science and education is investment in the future. Cutting it is simply the most fiscally irresponsible thing you can possibly do.
Comments
RE: Flip Flopper
I saw the title and just assumed that this was about Kerry. ;)
RE: Flip Flopper
Cooper posts great astronomy articles on here.
RE: Flip Flopper
Yeah well, if you really want a political rant: (NTY article)
"The discipline is one of a number - like high-energy physics and aspects of space science - where Europeans have recently come from behind to seize the initiative, dismaying some American experts."
Maybe its because Clinton killed the SSC, while CERN has all kinds of shiny new toys, and Bush has whacked the hard-science budget at the NSF and NASA to nearly nothing. Government spending on science and education is investment in the future. Cutting it is simply the most fiscally irresponsible thing you can possibly do.
There. :P