You are still not getting the point. Yes, frequency matters. Yes Moz seems* to be a better product. Yes IE is one big dillhole (sorry, been watching "That 70's Show" reruns.)
My point, and only point, is that a Critical flaw is a critical flaw. It is worthy of mention. It doesn't matter that it is the only one. It must still be addressed, it must still be patched, the knowledge that it exists must still be spread. Period. The spouting reference was in exact anticipation of your last post.
Sure if I was comparing Moz to IE for a recommendation to a company, client, or Mom, the number of security flaws would be a prime factor.
That does not forgive nor excuse not loudly complaing about critical security flaws.
And that is the point. I am not judging IE vs Moz (I've not used IE in a non-work, non-dillhole IE only site for years.) I don't like IE. I like Moz. Moz is better. Alls I'm saying is that the Moz flaw didn't get the press it deserved.
Please, please, please drop the IE vs. Moz thing. I'd think that you'd know my browser orientation by now.
oh yeah, f the anti-Bill movement.
* - Like some dude on a Moz-zine site said, Moz is getting popular enough now to target by malware dweebs. I will be curious to see how well it stands up. I, of course, hope for the best, but it could be interesting, none-the-less.
RE: vwon, twoooo, thrreeeee, voor!
You are still not getting the point. Yes, frequency matters. Yes Moz seems* to be a better product. Yes IE is one big dillhole (sorry, been watching "That 70's Show" reruns.)
My point, and only point, is that a Critical flaw is a critical flaw. It is worthy of mention. It doesn't matter that it is the only one. It must still be addressed, it must still be patched, the knowledge that it exists must still be spread. Period. The spouting reference was in exact anticipation of your last post.
Sure if I was comparing Moz to IE for a recommendation to a company, client, or Mom, the number of security flaws would be a prime factor.
That does not forgive nor excuse not loudly complaing about critical security flaws.
And that is the point. I am not judging IE vs Moz (I've not used IE in a non-work, non-dillhole IE only site for years.) I don't like IE. I like Moz. Moz is better. Alls I'm saying is that the Moz flaw didn't get the press it deserved.
Please, please, please drop the IE vs. Moz thing. I'd think that you'd know my browser orientation by now.
oh yeah, f the anti-Bill movement.
* - Like some dude on a Moz-zine site said, Moz is getting popular enough now to target by malware dweebs. I will be curious to see how well it stands up. I, of course, hope for the best, but it could be interesting, none-the-less.