Screaming Penguin - Source Does Matter

Ya know, I should just let this go. I really should. Mainly since its like I'm talking to myself here.

But hey, its me, so here goes. I make a final historic attempt at communication.

Four IE flaws are written about (sort of) in a story. I say that funny that this OS site didn't mention when an OS product has a (single) similar flaw. Knowing that the usual response is something along the lines of, "Yeah but that's just one flaw in N months, but MS products have them all time." I say, "that's not a valid reason." And it is still not.

I never made it Moz vs IE. I made it a lack of posting about a Moz vulnerability. Period. That was it.

Now, however, I have to get all wound up again. I really, really don't get the "is not critical IMHO and NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO MOZILLA....only affected Windows...."

Come on. No really. Come on. Half of the fuckin IE/Outlook/MSWord/blah/blah flaws are not due to that product, but that product's use of the OS. Are they no big deal? MS platforms are still by far the most prolific out there. I'd be willing to bet that the good readership of the penguin even use MS platforms to visit said site. To discount a critical flaw because it involves the use of an OS feature that is not an Open Source OS is just a little narrow minded.

Anyway, at best my original post "coverage of IE vs Moz" as opposed to "IE vs Moz" so you did, in fact, bring it up.

That's it, I'm shutting up because we have obviously reached an impass in comprehension.