Financial giants urge IM companies to interoperate: news.com

Seems Instant Messenging has some heavy hitter users and those users are pissed off that they have to maintain 4 different IM systems on every desktop because the silly things dont interoperate. It seem ridiculous that the IM players couldnt come up with standards and interoperate on their own, but now Wall Street firms like Lehman Brothers, J.P. Morgan Chase, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, UBS and Deutsche Bank are telling them to get their act together. That kind of clout may help, lets hope.

Seems these companies all have members on the brand new Instant Messaging Standards Board (IMSB). The IMSB was formed to help "nudge" IM companies in the interoperable direction. More details about the IMSB are supposed to be released soon.

Also, even though the coming up with an interoperable standard movement is admirable, these companies dont seem to realize that there IS already an open standard and open system, its called Jabber. While I do realize their frustration with the "normal" IM flavors, I think the same amount of effort these companies are putting into twisting arms could have been used at implementing Jabber, and that alone would have been a wake up call for the proprietary clowns. Jabber can in fact interoperate with all of the players, but it requires that the companies maintain their own servers and allow access to at least one additional non standard port. Most people just want to download the client and GO.

For more see the linked news.com story.   IM giants told to work it out: news.com

Comments

Re: Financial giants urge IM companies to interoperate: news.com

My impression was that it was never a problem with standards, rather AOL having the majority of users did not want to allow other companies (read Microsoft) to tap into their resources.

Open Source would not change this situation as long as AOL doesn't want to play with the others.

Re: Financial giants urge IM companies to interoperate: news.com

I think it would, thats my point. If enough big name companies adopted an open standard product, that might make AOL think twice about not interoperating. AOL goes out of its way to disable other clients that try to talk to AOL users. That might stop. True the issue is not really a standard underneath, but if there were a standard and companies could say "only use this product that meets this standard" that is another way of putting the pressure on AOL to play ball. Its really quite stupid that they dont, IMHO.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.