New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes passes House

The Democrats have been up in arms since the new Bush Tax Bill passed.

That bill included Child Tax Credits of $1000 per child that were to be retroactive for 2002. Basically if you paid enough income tax in 2002 to qualify you got a $600 per kid credit, and this was increased by $400 to $1000 by the new tax bill. So the government has decided to mail out $400 checks per kid to those that qualify, rather than wait and just let people increase the credit on next years returns (ah yeah, all PR baby, maybe it COSTS millions to process and mail them now, but send them anyway, its a huge waste of money but it sure looks great for ole politicians.)

So on to the uproar. Being that the included new provision was a TAX CREDIT that increased an exiting credit amount (ie returning something you already PAID, uh, a CREDIT) many low income families that DONT PAY ANY TAX (or dont pay enough tax to qualify for the credit) and military families that also DONT PAY ANY TAX did not get the credits (they of course did not get the previous $600 credit that is being increased to $1000, again, because they didnt pay enough tax to qualify for any credit).

The Democrats called this pandering to the rich and have made a debacle of the Republicans for not caring about poor people. Not to mention the brave men and women of our Armed forces defending us from terrorists all over the globe, they dont get the credit either because of the Republicans. "What callousness the Republicans have, they wont give the poor people (uh humm, cough, cough, under breath now, that didnt pay any taxes) a tax credit!"

One little problem as I see it, the Republicans are correct and the Democrats are incredibly stupid. IF YOU DIDNT PAY THE TAX YOU SHOULD NOT GET THE CREDIT! Is it just me? This is not even a partisan issue, or shouldnt be, its math?

I dont know how much simpler or more adamant this can get. I dont want anyone to get MY TAX MONEY as a CREDIT if they DIDNT PAY THE TAX THAT THE CREDIT IS BEING ISSUED FOR. Our government is increasing the deficit at record rates and its common knowledge that the budget is very tight and funds are being cut for all kinds of programs yet we are going to mail money to people under the guise of a tax credit when they didnt pay the tax?

Someone please tell me I dont understand this issue and that somehow this makes any damn sense at all?   House passes its version of child tax credit: Boston Globe

Comments

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

Yeah, I was kind of hoping that Bush would hold out, but the political pressure of the democrats have caused the Repubs to bend over. I still hope the Senate will hold out, but I doubt it. I think that all of these people deep down know that they are receiving a welfare handout, but also feel that they are 'entitled' to it.

I think this just goes to show that although we supposedly have to different political parties, the line between the two is getting fuzzier as time marches on.

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

Uh, correction. It was the House that was holding out, not the Senate. Ah crap. We lost.

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

It's all about perspective...Don't be pissed off thinking your tax dollars are being paid to poor people. Think that your tax dollars are helping to pay for one of those cruise missles we fired a few months ago. The poor are being paid for by the Treasury borrowing more money.

Your worries about a 'credit' versus a gift is pure semantics. We are already spending more than we tax so our theory is to put a bunch of cash in the hands of 'Mericans' so they will go out and spend it and poof our economy will be as good as it was when the Democrats were in office. So why don't you give poor people cash as well as rich people? If you look at it logically poor people are 100% certain of spending it cuz they don't have anything to begin with - that has to be better than giving upper middle class folks that money that they might use to pay down credit card debt instead of buying new things. Although those poor people are probably just going to buy crack and that won't really help Wall Street...

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

damn man, made me think several times and laugh a few times, truly (not sarcastic) great post.

i agree about the spending of the poor people and the government and i love the cruise missle and crack cracks.

while i know poor people will spend it i still dont understand how we justify the "credit" (semantics or not, its paying OUT money to people) and i really hate it when we decide to mail out checks in midstream rather than just change next years tax returns (and i qualify for the credits, i am not bitching cause i wont get any, i am bitching cause its a huge waste of money and political stunt)

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

You and I are in total agreement on the stupidity of mailing out these checks - maybe it's some form of hidden subsidy for our postal service and check printers (I heard a story about how online bill paying is really hurting the check printers)

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

I like buying cruise missles. I also like buying crack. Now I'm in a pickle as to how I should spend my tax credit...

Actually, the total cost of the Iraq war is now put at $220 per American. Not so shabby - I would have donated that amount voluntarily just to see the murdering bastard out of there. [url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-06-12-war-costs_x.htm]USA Today Story[/url]

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

ok, slow down cowboy, dont get me started on the total cost of the iraq war or that silly article you linked.

jesus, just dont go there.

the "combat phase", what the _fuck_ is that? it ended in mid april? does the 10 soldiers that died last week count as part of the "combat phase"? is the war over? what are the costs going forward? how long will we be in iraq?

i am so tired of all the media outlets stating "since the war ended", that **** aint over, and the commander of forces in the arena said exactly that, he said YESTERDAY, its still an "active combat zone".

this thing is gonna cost us shitloads, for a long damn time to come, in terms of economic and foreign relations.

dont get me wrong, i would have paid 220 bucks (or even my entire child tax credit of 400) to see saddam ousted also, but not like this, not in a unilateral debacle that has IMHO been the worst foreign policy move in the history of the United States. same old debate, but it should have been un sanctioned, it should have been weapons inspectors, it should have been actually multilateral, etc, etc, etc.

what _fucking_ amazes me now that the US has not found any of the WMDs that supposedly justified the urgency in the timeframe. the President is now saying "calm down, we will find those darn nucuLAR weapons, it takes damn time, just wait", and uh, if I recall, that was EXACTLY the argument the UN and the inspectors were making before the conflict, they were just a legitimate organization rather than an occupying invading force and they could actually pronounce nuclear.

cheap war my ass.

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

Oh, no, I KNOW you didn't go there! OK, its on, boy...

1. Unilateral: Obligating only one of two or more parties, nations, or persons, as a contract or an agreement.

Dude - we had Britain and quite a few others on our side! It wasn't unilateral, it just wasn't with the approval of that namby-pamby UN organization.

2. Yeah, I know, I was joking. It will cost a lot more than $220 per person when all is said and done. However, just think of the savings you will realize at the gas pump. Just joking! Actually, though, the oil pumped from Iraq is supposed to help offset the rebuilding and costs associated. We'll see. Bush is a big-spending government guy, just like a democrat, so it will get more expensive.

3. WMD's - yeah, we haven't found them. This doesn't worry me because I think we were lied to. Fact is, EVERYBODY, even the UN, agrees that Iraq had them, and nobody seems to no where they went. What worries me is that last part - where in the hell did all fo these WMD's go to if they are no longer in Iraq??????

4.Yes, the UN guys were saying 'Just wait, we need more time', but they were also being bamboozled by an Iraqi regime who was playing the shell game with them. Well, now our inspectors can pretty much go anywhere they want unimpeded.

5. Why is it always 'No WMD's have been found, this war sucked!' Personally, all of the evidence of the mass graves makes me think we did the damn right thing, regardless of what the initial reasoning was. They've found mass graves with the skeletons of babies still tied to their mothers and of children holding dolls! How in the hell can we not justify our actions after hearing about all of these atrocities?

6. Nothing that all of the war naysayers said about the consequences of the war have come true. 'Huge civilian casualties. Major unrest in the mid-east. All of the oil fields set ablaze. Warring islamic factions. etc etc.' So now that it seems like the war was a good thing, all of these naysayers, instead of saying 'mea culpa' are looking for anything to point to rather than seeing all the good that has been accomplished.

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

I guess I might be the only one that thinks $220 per person is a lot of money. This obviously wasn't about weapons of mass destruction, hell our intelligence agencies had to forge documents just to make it seem possible. I don't think it had anything to do with terrorism - Sadam was a dictator, definately not a devout Muslim fanatic. If we are reduced to saying things like "It was worth 200 bucks to get that bad guy out of there" then let's start making a list of all the other countries with worse dictators than Sadam and go run them out. It just seems irresponsible to me that our 'my way or the highway' approach we took with other world leaders is going to cost us so much. IIRC - The previous gulf war was 70% funded by other countries, but because of our arrogance we are having to foot the entire bill both in human lives and money. We bitched about France and how many coward jokes did we hear, but who is rescuing all those people (Americans included) in the Congo right now? Just because they doubted our information (hehe...must have been a lucky guess)...what a frickin disaster. Why aren't we asking for the U.N. to go in now and help us out? I am curious...do any of the pro-war guys out there think Iraq will be pro-US when this is finally over and done with?

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

ok, one more bite

1. unilateral, multilateral my ass, britian and spain who were "allies" that did nothing except mop up and had zero support of the people at home and participated at all because of enourmous financial pressure to do so, dont count as multilateral. maybe bilateral with britain, MAYBE, but the rest were just puppets.

2. "Bush is a big spending guy" . . . "just like a democrat", well, I like the fiscal policies of the Republicans in general better than the fiscal policies of the Democrats, yet I like the social tolerance and basic understanding of humanity (non christian white) the Democrats have much better than the Republicans. Even so, you are right, I cant believe the governmental fiscal policies under while the supposed smaller government party controls the congress and the white house. Maybe calling Democrats the big spenders isnt quite fair anymore?

3. WMDs - yeah I think he had them TOO. but as I said BEFORE THIS DAMN THING STARTED I think inspectors and the UN process will find more than going in and blowing **** up and taking over. I hope we DO FIND them to help the world get over this issue once and for all, and to account for them (as you said, where the hell are they?). However, the first gulf war had some of the same premises (not all) and even then the inspectors uncovered and destroyed more weapons than the military. My point here was not that he doesnt and didnt have WMDs, but that it WILL TAKE TIME to find them, inspectors would have done a better job because they would have been more "contained" (rather than shipped to Syria) AND that the urgency that the President said was the reason we had to attack when we did was bullshit. Now he is saying it will take time, well my friend, agreed, and again, thats what the inspectors said beforehand.

4. agreed Iraq was playing games, but so what? they were still contained within their own country, no fly zones, sanctions, etc. we should have allowed the inspectors and the UN to put the pressure on, at our behest fine, but going outside the UN and attacking anyway was flat out stupid and hasnt accomplished anything. also we put the cost at 220 per american taxpayer, does that include all the lives lost, have we put a price on all the US military and Iraqi true civilians that have died? Are they in the "price" equation somewhere. To me this whole has just been a huge debacle, its not worth 1 life much less thousands to have a less safe world overall and the UN trying to occupy iraq under the guise of liberation. dont get me wrong again, I think the US WANT to liberate Iraq, but if they wont quit fighting what they see as an occupying force (justifiably so IMHO) then we have to fight back and we are just perpetuating the "occupying force" crap.

5. combo of three and four, and again i think they DID/DO have WMDs and i hope we find them (frankly, with the questionable evidence that was provided pre war at the UN I am surprised the US hasnt planted something by now, I give the US government great credit for having NOT found anything yet while being under such enourmous pressure to do so, if this was the LAPD in South Central, do you think they would not have found any crack by now?)

6. "So now that it seems like the war was a good thing" dude, i am one of the "naysayers" and i think we have destroyed foreign relations with virtually every arab nation. and with most of europe. i think the war "seems" like a terrible mistake, it was a speciously justified invasion of a foreign nation and we in the us like to spout freedom, liberty, soverignty, etc. i realize that many cowboys dont give a crap about any other countries, but it does matter in an age of globalization. these nations may elect either not to say anything or to mumble their discontent in the face of relations with the US being so important to them, but their is a lot of ill will around the world because of this crap and it will matter, it wont just go away, it was earned. also no mass casualties, what? there have been many civilian causualties, also what about the crap now, no power, no food, no jobs, one hell of a liberation and the mess has just begun. good thing my ass.

and to top it all off "seeing all the good that has been accomplished" WTF? please explain what "good" has been done. sure saddam aint there, but we havent found him? now we have to run that country at great expense, the people of that country hate us and dont have food, electricity, security, water, jobs, etc. and we have been so arrogant and unjustified that we have certainly created generations of new america haters. more terrorism and more ill will will result. overall i think the world is FAR LESS SAFE (as Amnesty Internation stated in a fairly comprehensive world wide report recently) "all the good" my ass. what the hell was the goal anyway? what has been accomplished please enlighten me.

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

this is why we need the political site, i have a bunch of new information on this rant/subject after watching NOW with Bill Moyers over the weekend (great show) but this is not the place for this discussion.

i know you can refute everything i say also, so we need the new site, which means i need to get to work.

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

Yeah, you're right. I guess the endings of all of the brutal torture, mass murders, and genocide isn't that big a deal. My bad. ;-)

Re: New Child Tax Credit Bill for people that dont pay taxes pa

yeah ok, you are right on track now, i LIKE mass murder and torture, thats why i dont the war was good thing.

not that mass murder and torture have ever gone on in other countries around the world that the US SUPPORTS, nor that they havent happened IN THE US.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.