Some time back the Sinclair Broadcast Group refused to air Nightline with Ted Koppel because the program was a reading of the names of the American Iraq war dead. There was no other political commentary AT ALL, yet Sinclair called that program a left biased anti war statement and refused to air it (and there was some discussion at the time here).
Sinclair is back in the news because a few days before the election Sinclair plans to air an anti Kerry "documentary" called "Stolen Honor" about Kerrys anti war stance (and how purportedly horrible they proclaim that was, see the PBS Frontline "The Choice" program for a real documentary on this matter).
If this program they plan to air is not produced by a journalistic entity and indeed is an anti Kerry political statement as it is billed to be (I havent seen it) then it is a huge disservice to the customers of Sinclair and another huge mistake by the company.
Now we again visit the fact that this is a private company. And thus they have the right to air whatever they want. However I think this is a mistake because if it is obvious political bias it does not belong on public airways or on a normal over the air network. If this were the "SBG" channel then fine, air whatever and we will know that it comes from a certain angle to begin with (such as Fox News Network) but to air a single political position and purport it to be a "documentary" is just plain wrong.
Should it be illegal? Nope. But Sinclairs frachise agreements with networks that grant them frachisee status should be reconsidered by those companies AND customers should demand better by contacting investment firms and advertisers that do business with Sinclair and so on.
And yes this would be just as wrong if it were an anti Bush "documentary" on public airways and aired on regular network affiliate stations. For instance if Fahrenheit 9/11 were played on some liberal broadcast group days before the election.
We should all use the means available and contact the advertisers and the networks themselves and any investment funds we participate in and tell them this political posturing by a large media corporation for the benefit of a particular political position disguised as journalism is flat out wrong and we wont support it any further.
Comments
RE: Sinclair Broadcast Group pulls another political stunt
geeze, i cant even get commentary on POLITICAL stories anymore (i know lots of people say they dont like the politics here, but somehow they all usually like to comment ;)).
RE: Sinclair Broadcast Group pulls another political stunt
Is this a derivation of the other documentary?
http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/101104v1-1.wmv
As for Sinclair... it's their decision, but it's probably a mistake. You can't call it anything but a documentary, though. As Micheal Moore pointed out, a documentary DOES have a purpose, it can be politically motivated, and it can misrepresent facts.
I don't think it would be wrong to put Fahrenheit 9/11 on the air, either; in fact, it might balance the whole thing out a bit.
Either way... I think we're screwed no matter who gets in.
RE: Sinclair Broadcast Group pulls another political stunt
I would agree that if we put them BOTH on that would be balanced. But I would rather, just as a customer of ABC or NBC or whatever, not see EITHER on my public OTA network station. Again, I dont think its something they should not be allowed to do (as some have said) but rather I think its their choice, albeit a bad one (regardless of their political motivations).
RE: Sinclair Broadcast Group pulls another political stunt
They know they will have to deal with the fallout. As long as this is a decision based on their belief that more people will want to watch - which means more revenue - I don't see that it's a big deal. If the reasons behind it are to influence the voting public based on the personal beliefs of those in charge, they are accountable to their stockholders for not making their decisions based on the best interests of the company.
RE: Sinclair Broadcast Group pulls another political stunt
I think the phrase 'accountable to their stockholders' pretty much sums up the state of our government. It's fairly obvious that a company with a stated pro-Bush has already used it's control over the airways to influence what its viewers can watch and now is doing the same thing and our biggest critisicm is 'accountable to their stockholders'? Are the public airways not public anymore? Have we given up the charade that our government is 'by the people for the people' and replaced it with 'by the bought for the corporations'?
Does the FCC actually do anything anymore? - I mean other than place silly fines on for publicity stunts, that really just serve to get the names of those involved out on the air again after the stunt is over.
RE: Sinclair Broadcast Group pulls another political stunt
If Fahrenheit 9/11 was broadcast on a normal broadcast channel, I suspect (in the current environment) it would get more than its fair share of viewers.
Free speech is a right given to individuals as well as corporations. If I, NASCAR, decide that I don't want to be associated with smoking, I preassure Winston to leave the sport. If I don't want hard liquer advertised on my vehicles, I can make that decision. Each decision is based on the company as a whole doing better in the long run by reaching out in other marketting areas.
The FCC is not responsible for making business decisions on behalf of companies. They fine broadcasters for doing things that are on a list of "don't do this" things. Ask Howard Stern if the FCC does anything.
RE: Sinclair Broadcast Group pulls another political stunt
As it turns out money talks and since Sinclair stock dropped 16% AND they have been reprimanded for several ethics issues AND shareholders are threatening lawsuits over jeapordizing profits for a purely partisan political move THEY HAVE BACKED OFF (they now state they will air only parts of "Stolen Honor" in the context of a program *about* media and influencing elections (shrewd, does Rove work there?)). They also have hinted that they might show parts of a positive "documentary" about Kerry in Vietnam as well called "Going Upriver".
Sinclar still has a few issues though . . .
http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/spew4th.pl?ascribeid=20041021.082628&time...
http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/3836107/detail.html