eh, i watched it, but as always regardless of what mr pulitzer, er peabody, er fucking nothing liar award winner olieely says i just cant take him seriously. the guy just makes me laugh even when other actual journalists are not calling his bullshit and someone else has not edited the clip to put real stats on top of it. hes just the total and complete definition of "fucktard".
It's just funny, because you have Krugman who is almost a cliche academic sitting there next to O'Reilly and they never get past one point -- which in all fairness to Krugman, he was generally right on.
It's funny too to see O'Reilly, and the whole right-side punditry's response. There is only a black or white option. Krugman is an economist, and they are rarely opposed to tax cuts, but the whole thrust of his book was that (a) the real ramifications and even nature of the tax cuts, like the drug bill, were consistently misstated publicly by the administration, and (b) if economic stimulus is your goal, while "any" non-revenue neutral action by the goverment will provide it, these tax cuts were by design particularly ineffective as the bulk of the cuts went to sectors where they wouldn't drive consumer spending.
Anybody remember when political shows were "boring" and they actually talked about stuff rather than just shouting?
Comments
RE: Krugman vs O'Reilly
eh, i watched it, but as always regardless of what mr pulitzer, er peabody, er fucking nothing liar award winner olieely says i just cant take him seriously. the guy just makes me laugh even when other actual journalists are not calling his bullshit and someone else has not edited the clip to put real stats on top of it. hes just the total and complete definition of "fucktard".
RE: Krugman vs O'Reilly
It's just funny, because you have Krugman who is almost a cliche academic sitting there next to O'Reilly and they never get past one point -- which in all fairness to Krugman, he was generally right on.
It's funny too to see O'Reilly, and the whole right-side punditry's response. There is only a black or white option. Krugman is an economist, and they are rarely opposed to tax cuts, but the whole thrust of his book was that (a) the real ramifications and even nature of the tax cuts, like the drug bill, were consistently misstated publicly by the administration, and (b) if economic stimulus is your goal, while "any" non-revenue neutral action by the goverment will provide it, these tax cuts were by design particularly ineffective as the bulk of the cuts went to sectors where they wouldn't drive consumer spending.
Anybody remember when political shows were "boring" and they actually talked about stuff rather than just shouting?