Larry Lessig has a bit in the LA Times about the nature of Google Print and the problems our stupid IP systems might cause it:
Los Angeles Times: Let a Thousand Googles Bloom:Last month, Google announced a partnership with major research libraries to scan 20 million books for inclusion in Google's search database. For those works in the public domain, the full text will be available. For those works still possibly under copyright, only snippets will be seen. The potential of this project is only beginning to be understood � it is likely to bring about the most dramatic changes in the nature of research and the spread of culture since the birth of Google itself.
But the excitement around Google's extraordinary plan has obscured a dirty little secret: It is not at all clear that Google and these libraries have the legal right to do what is proposed. For work in the public domain, the right is clear enough. But for work not in the public domain, Google's right to scan � to copy � whole texts to index is uncertain at best, even if it ultimately makes only snippets available. When permission has been given by the copyright holder, again there's no problem. But when permission has not been secured, the law is essentially uncertain. If lawsuits were filed, and if Google and its partner libraries were found to have violated the law, their legal exposure could reach into the billions.
Comments
RE: Lessig on Google Print
How is this different than what Amazon is doing? It's just an abstraction between Amazon which is selling it directly and Google which is selling links to stores who sell it directly.
RE: Lessig on Google Print
The difference is, Amazon gets their "Iside the book" scans from the publisher with direct permission. For an old, forgotten out of print book still under copyright, maybe nobody cares that Google scans it, maybe they do. Anything on Amazon, though, is "in-print" and for sale.