From the Pew Internet project:
Internet users are extremely positive about search engines and the experiences they have when searching the internet. But these same satisfied internet users are generally unsophisticated about why and how they use search engines. They are also strikingly unaware of how search engines operate and how they present their results.
Internet users behave conservatively as searchers: They tend to settle quickly on a single search engine and then stick with it, rather than switching as search technology evolves or comparing results from different search systems. Some 44% of searchers regularly use just one engine, and another 48% use just two or three. Nearly half of searchers use a search engines no more than a few times a week, and two-thirds say they could walk away from search engines without upsetting their lives very much.
Internet users trust their favorite search engines, but few say they are aware of the financial incentives that affect how search engines perform and how they present their search results.
Only 38% of users are aware of the distinction between paid or "sponsored" results and unpaid results. And only one in six say they can always tell which results are paid or sponsored and which are not. This finding is ironic, since nearly half of all users say they would stop using search engines if they thought engines were not being clear about how they presented paid results.
[Emphasis mine]
I always wonder if the same 40-45% of people overlaps with the people who believe we found WMDs in Iraq, give Bush a positive job approval, believe in alien abduction and a 6,000 year old earth. I mean, is it just 45% of people have no synaptic function at all? Somebody needs to do a big "overlap" study on this stuff.
Comments
RE: You ever noticed how its always about 45% of people are jus
LMAO.
RE: You ever noticed how its always about 45% of people are jus
Yeah I saw this article a while back and found it pretty pathetic. It doesnt really matter which search engine people use or how often and so on but not being aware of whats paid and what is not is just silly. (And personally I wont use a search engine that does not have clear terms about how they accept paid search results AND clearly marks such results.)
One of the best quotes of all time was Eisenhower or Roosevelt or something who was astonished that "almost half of all Americans have below average intelligence".
And what cracks me up is that if you use that phrase on a search engine you get all sorts of results where still people dont believe it (brilliant people eh ;)).
I found a few beauties (mostly on conservative sites curiously). A thread on free republic - about how the average bush voter has a three points higher IQ than the average Kerry voter - shows that even some of the posters proclaim they have enormously high IQs yet dont understand what an "average" is! For example "cuteconservativechick" (whom is probably ugly I might point out ;)) says she has an IQ of "230" and doesnt believe the "average" IQ is so low. Ok I digress, but I amuse myself ;).
RE: You ever noticed how its always about 45% of people are jus
LOL... You remember that Gary Colman made for TV movie "The Boy with a 200 IQ"? That just made me think of that.
RE: You ever noticed how its always about 45% of people are jus
IQ = Intelligence Quotient
Defined as: Mental Age / Biological Age
therefore: 100 = 1:1 ratio of mental age and biological age
therefore: 100 = normal or "average"
I think people should know the mechanics of what IQ is before they use it in a statistic. By the way it was Eisenhower who was TOLD the statistic that "50% of all Americans have Below Average intelligence", he did not say it.