The Culture Wars in IMAX

Also in the NYT this morning, IMAX is backing off films that might offend the superstitious religious right:

he fight over evolution has reached the big, big screen.

Several Imax theaters, including some in science museums, are refusing to show movies that mention the subject - or the Big Bang or the geology of the earth - fearing protests from people who object to films that contradict biblical descriptions of the origin of Earth and its creatures.

The number of theaters rejecting such films is small, people in the industry say - perhaps a dozen or fewer, most in the South. But because only a few dozen Imax theaters routinely show science documentaries, the decisions of a few can have a big impact on a film's bottom line - or a producer's decision to make a documentary in the first place.

People who follow trends at commercial and institutional Imax theaters say that in recent years, religious controversy has adversely affected the distribution of a number of films, including "Cosmic Voyage," which depicts the universe in dimensions running from the scale of subatomic particles to clusters of galaxies; "Galápagos," about the islands where Darwin theorized about evolution; and "Volcanoes of the Deep Sea," an underwater epic about the bizarre creatures that flourish in the hot, sulfurous emanations from vents in the ocean floor.

"Volcanoes," released in 2003 and sponsored in part by the National Science Foundation and Rutgers University, has been turned down at about a dozen science centers, mostly in the South, said Dr. Richard Lutz, the Rutgers oceanographer who was chief scientist for the film. He said theater officials rejected the film because of its brief references to evolution, in particular to the possibility that life on Earth originated at the undersea vents.

Carol Murray, director of marketing for the Fort Worth Museum of Science and History, said the museum decided not to offer the movie after showing it to a sample audience, a practice often followed by managers of Imax theaters. Ms. Murray said 137 people participated in the survey, and while some thought it was well done, "some people said it was blasphemous."

In their written comments, she explained, they made statements like "I really hate it when the theory of evolution is presented as fact," or "I don't agree with their presentation of human existence."

On other criteria, like narration and music, the film did not score as well as other films, Ms. Murray said, and over all, it did not receive high marks, so she recommended that the museum pass.

"If it's not going to draw a crowd and it is going to create controversy," she said, "from a marketing standpoint I cannot make a recommendation" to show it.

In interviews, officials at other Imax theaters said they had similarly decided against the film for fear of offending some audiences.

"We have definitely a lot more creation public than evolution public," said Lisa Buzzelli, who directs the Charleston Imax Theater in South Carolina, a commercial theater next to the Charleston Aquarium. Her theater had not ruled out ever showing "Volcanoes," Ms. Buzzelli said, "but being in the Bible Belt, the movie does have a lot to do with evolution, and we weigh that carefully."

Pietro Serapiglia, who handles distribution for the producer Stephen Low of Montreal, whose company made the film, said officials at other theaters told him they could not book the movie "for religious reasons," because it had "evolutionary overtones" or "would not go well with the Christian community" or because "the evolution stuff is a problem."

Hyman Field, who as a science foundation official had a role in the financing of "Volcanoes," said he understood that theaters must be responsive to their audiences. But Dr. Field he said he was "furious" that a science museum would decide not to show a scientifically accurate documentary like "Volcanoes" because it mentioned evolution.

"It's very alarming," he said, "all of this pressure being put on a lot of the public institutions by the fundamentalists."

People who follow the issue say it is more likely to arise at science centers and other public institutions than at commercial theaters. The filmmaker James Cameron, who was a producer on "Volcanoes," said the commercial film he made on the same topic, "Aliens of the Deep," had not encountered opposition, except during post-production, when "it was requested from some theaters that we change a line of dialogue" relating to sun worship by ancient Egyptians. The line remained, he said.

Mr. Cameron said he was "surprised and somewhat offended" that people were sensitive to the references to evolution in "Volcanoes."

"It seems to be a new phenomenon," he said, "obviously symptomatic of our shift away from empiricism in science to faith-based science."

Some in the industry say they fear that documentary filmmakers will steer clear of science topics likely to offend religious fundamentalists.

Large-format science documentaries "are generally not big moneymakers," said Joe DeAmicis, vice president for marketing at the California Science Center in Los Angeles and formerly the director of its Imax theater. "It's going to be hard for our filmmakers to continue to make unfettered documentaries when they know going in that 10 percent of the market" will reject them.

Others who follow the issue say many institutions are not able to resist such pressure.

"They have to be extremely careful as to how they present anything relating to evolution," said Bayley Silleck, who wrote and directed "Cosmic Voyage." Mr. Silleck said he confronted religious objections to that film and predicted he would face them again with a project he is working on now, about dinosaurs.

Of course, a number of factors affect a theater manager's decision about a movie. Mr. Silleck said an Imax documentary about oil fires in Kuwait "never reached its distribution potential" because it had shots of the first Persian Gulf war. "The theaters decided their patrons would be upset at seeing the bodies," he said.

"We all have to make films for an audience that is a family audience," he went on, "when you are talking about Imax, because they are in science centers and museums."

He added, however, "there are a number of us who are concerned that there is a kind of tacit overcaution, overprotectedness of the audience on the part of theater operators."

In any event, censoring films like "Volcanoes" is not an option, said Dr. Field, who said Mr. Low, the film's producer, got in touch with him when the evolution issue arose to ask whether the film should be altered.

"I said absolutely not," recalled Dr. Field, who retired from the National Science Foundation last year.

Mr. Low said that arguments over religion and science disturbed him because of his own religious faith. In his view, he said, science is "a celebration of what nature or God has done. So for me, there's no conflict."

...

Dr. Lutz, the Rutgers oceanographer, recalled a showing of "Volcanoes" he and Mr. Low attended at the New England Aquarium. When the movie ended, a little girl stood in the audience to challenge Mr. Low on the film's suggestion that Earth might have formed billions of years ago in the explosion of a star. "I thought God created the Earth," she said.

He replied, "Maybe that's how God did it."

"If it's not going to draw a crowd and it is going to create controversy," she said, "from a marketing standpoint I cannot make a recommendation" to show it.

That is just about the dumbest thing I have ever heard in my life. How can someone in charge of booking a film believe that something can be controversial AND not draw a crowd? I mean, "The Last Temptation of Christ" was a bloody horrible movie that no one would have seen if the Catholics hadn't gotten their panties in a wad about it.

But you can always count on Fafblog for perspective...

Giblets, surprisingly enough, is outraged! Giblets just returned from seeing the IMAX documentary "Volcanoes," hoping to calm his jangly nerves with the soothing sight of exploding mountains of magma, only to be incensed by the heresies against established Gibletsian doctrine contained within!

Not once did the film acknowledge that lava flows are created by Oblos the Fire Monkey at the earth's core, or that continental drift is caused by the armies of mole men who dance for Giblets's amusement! The movie also maintained the mad fiction that complex life evolved over billions of years according to natural selection instead of being assembled in the distant future by the Machine Lords of the Gibletarium! Madness and heresy! Shock and horror!

Giblets calls for a full boycott of "Volcanoes" by all right and proper Giblets-fearing people and the immediate burning of all apostates involved in its production! In the meantime Gilblets orders the making of decent, accurate documentaries based on the proven, scientific accounts of the origin of the universe found in the holy tome and autobiography, Giblets: The Man, the Myth, the Me.

Comments

RE: The Culture Wars in IMAX

Sad sad state of affairs in the US. People WANT misinformation because of their own insecurities. Says a lot about the "public" as addressed in this post.

RE: The Culture Wars in IMAX

Neither creation nor evolution can be proven. The entire debate is stupid.

RE: The Culture Wars in IMAX

Evolution can't be proven?? hmmmm.

RE: The Culture Wars in IMAX

Depends on what you mean by "proven".

If you mean an accepted body of evidence and observational facts, then evolution is already proven. (Not only in actual observation, but also in the fossil record, and also at a molecular DNA level.) If you mean my ideology says I dont want to believe any fact the scientific communtiy provides, then no it can never be proven, not to you.

Now I will grant you that the question of whether or not God exists and created the universe and so on is insoluble. Thats a silly debate. But that life started on the planet we know as earth BILLIONS of years ago and evolved into the various forms we see around us today, rather than each being unrelated and created on its own, is proven fact. This is not about the existence of God or not, not about the much more difficult question of how the first life began, but about good ole natural selection and evolution, and thats entirely factual (if you bother to look into it and dont just respond with the typical cognitive dissonance of "its just a theory", that just belies that you have no idea what a "theory" is, not that the "theory" is invalid).

And aside these are SCIENTIFIC movies dealing with SCIENTIFIC facts. If you dont want to hear about the facts then DONT SEE THE MOVE - or MAKE YOUR OWN MOVIE - dont try to change or censor the movie(s) presented by the overwhelming evidence put forth by the scientific community.

RE: The Culture Wars in IMAX

It's going to be interesting when we finally find signs of life on other planets (or moons) that never evolved past the single cell organism. Will we need another creation story, but instead of 7 days just a few days? Let's see on day one He separated light from dark (I guess made the sun). On day 2 he separated land from water, so that counts as well. So I suppose the story goes for Mars (or insert your planet of choice) on day 3 he started to make plants, decided maybe this planet wasn't the best place to start and moved on.

RE: The Culture Wars in IMAX

You know I have thought about that before and I dont think its going to be such a big deal. I mean sure short term it will have an effect, but long term, not much (in terms of religion). Lets face it, the universe is not geocentric, religion got over that, the Earth is not 6000 years old, religion got over that (well sorta, most did, most acknowledge it now, some stick to their guns in a fit of ludicrous nonsense), the Earth is not flat, religion got over that. so on, so on, so on all over the religious place. Somehow some way religion will itself adapt, it always has. Isnt it ironic, doncha think?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.