the blogosphere has proven once again to be an amoral place with few rules

NPR fucks up but the real bad guys are those bloggers!

First, it is essential to report on government documents. But in this case, publishing the unedited report (albeit unintentionally) could have -- and could yet -- threaten peoples' lives. There are times when editors have to make a difficult choice between the public's right to know and the risk of endangering lives. But this was not one of those instances. NPR was right to remove the documents from its Web site once it became clear that the full version could be accessed.

Second, the blogosphere has proven once again to be an amoral place with few rules. The consequences for misbehavior are still vague. The possibility of civic responsibility remains remote. It is a place where the philosophy of "who posts first, wins" predominates.

Yeah, because the the rest of the media doesn't live by "who prints first, wins". Whatever.

This isn't a question of morality, it is a question of practicality. You can't re-establish a "secret". "Information want's to be free" may be a battle cry for certain people who any right minded person would consider to be dipshits, but there is still an axiomatic if not physical law truth to it. "Everthing wants to fall apart," would be a similar way to express a similar truth. To pontificate mangnanimously that (a) every single person on the internet should somehow accept your moral judgement about what information that is available, shouldn't be, and then (b) every single person on the internet should go back and cover up your own fuck up that precipitated the exact situation you have such moral outrage about is frankly unbelievable.

We in the software world have generally come to the conclusion that security through obscurity is a myth anyway. Maybe NPR should hire some people who have a god damned clue about computers before they take it on themselves to publish sensitive information.

Comments

RE: the blogosphere has proven once again to be an amoral place

Geeze that article is just, well, moronic.

NPR blames the bloggers and calls them "pesky" and "amoral" because they posted a fucking PDF with the content blacked out. "Amoral"!. Shut the hell up, of course people are going to read the document you posted and comment on the "security" measures therein. Did these bloggers jeapordize any security or did the jackasses that delivered the "redacted" report in PDF form cause the alleged harm (I would argue that the report doesnt really put anything in danger, thats a separate issue but instead its a great example of bullshit security measures the we require "secrecy" for, sure names should have been left out but what else in ther e is a security revelation worth hiding?).

"soon discovered if they downloaded the document from npr.org and translated it into another format, the edited portions could be restored."

Another format? Its not like this took a rocket surgeon, you use that great hackers tool called "Acrobat Reader" and you "save as text".

Hell they could hire a monkey, much less someone who has a "clue about computers" and do a better job of keeping things "secure" than that.

The bigger question in all of this though is why did the defense department provide the document to a news outlet in PDF form (assuming they did - they had to provide it in some form that was stupid and had the clear text, reader cant make the text appear - the original provided report is the real issue).

RE: the blogosphere has proven once again to be an amoral place

It just blows me away..

NPR was right to remove the documents from its Web site once it became clear that the full version could be accessed.

Not "NPR was dumb as shit and I can't believe people here can be that careless," but "NPR was right..." And then, lets segue into, roughly, 'Bloggers are just completely irresponsible and have no ethics.' Talk about blinded by your own spin.

RE: the blogosphere has proven once again to be an amoral place

Where did NPR get a PDF version of a "redacted" document? Thats who fucked up, its not like they retyped it and blacked the "sensitive" parts out themselves (yeah they screwed up also, and then they didnt accept responsibility, but the real issue is how they got that document to begin with).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.