To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Tagged:
Yeah, I know - we really shouldn\'t get into this. But quite honestly, BOTH sides have been putting up a lot of dishonest rhetoric. The left says that Bush lied about saying Iraq was an immediate threat (he didn\'t), that he said there was a clear connection between Saddam and Al Qaida (again, he didn\'t), and that Iraq had all sorts of WMD\'s. Not sure about this last one - he may have been mistaken, much like our entire intelligence community (and even Bill Clinton) were. He may have depended too much on foreign intelligence. Or he could have stretched the truth - lied. Anyways, check out the article for a discussion on the immediate threat lie. Now, please note, I am NOT a fan of Bush. I do think that the war against Iraq was a good thing. I think we were too hasty and definitely underestimated the costs. There was a lot of emphasis placed on going into Iraq that I think really was just propoganda. But this constant HE LIED bullcrap seriously has to stop. I mean, crap, TED KENNEDY??? He\'s the biggest f*cking drunk-ass, living off his family\'s fame and fortune never done a damn good thing in his life murdering/manslaughtering but got away with it liar in the entire senate. Anyways- Folks continually spout how much people who watch Fox news are getting false ideas. Yes, Fox is a little \'right of center\'. But that\'s the pot calling the kettle black, as far as I\'m concerned. If you read the NY Times or get your news from CNN you are definitely getting a left of center view of the news.   Townhall article about he lied stuff

Comments

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

I can tell you are a bit indignant and angry aout the "rhetoric" and while its true a lot of crap is flying back and forth from both sides, Bush did LIE. He lied about all three things you mention, he DID say there was an immediate threat, he DID make the Al Queda link (he has since backed off but he and his entire administration clearly spun the "terrorism" crap all along and continue to call Iraq the front in the "war on terror" to THIS DAY!) and he DID say they had nuclear weapons. ALL THREE ARE VERY CLEAR, WELL DOCUMENTED (uh, 2 of them are in the STATE OF THE UNION!) AND LIES. While Saddam was a bad guy and all that ****, he was clearly never involved in the religious fanatical terrorism crap that the administration has DESPERATELY tried to lump him in with at every turn, much less involved with the enduring evil of "Al Quaeda". Saddam also clearly did NOT have nuclear weapons (sure he wants them, but want is not the same as have, and guess what, if he had them we WOULD NOT HAVE INVADED HIS COUNTRY, so basically our actions have just told N Korea and Iran to get their ass in gear and GET NUKES or BE NEXT). You may not like it my friend but on this one you are totally wrong and Bush has EARNED all this consternation, because he LIED on all counts. Not only that but the "conservatives", especially the zealot neo-cons, should face reality and admit the debacle of Iraq so we can move on. We need to rebuild now and we also need to protect troops. We need to admit that the UN ws correct BEFORE the invasion and that diplomatic methods and further inspections would have been a better course of action. (Jesus now the Bush weapons team says "we need more time", is that a familiar refrain or what? Yet when the UN said it the response was "hell no we dont have any time to give, the danger is to imminent and they have weapons and we know where!). We need to admit the reality that if all the misinformation of the Bush adminisration was not presented before the invasion that it may not have happened. People may have made better decisions if they were dealing with facts, rather than with assumptions and "desires" that they bent the facts towards. If we COULD cope with that and give authority to the UN in the rebuilding process then other nations might be willing to really help and DESPITE OUR STUPIDITY AND ARROGANCE TO GET US INTO THIS SITUATION OTHERS MIGHT HELP. Or we can continue to try to save face and argue about bias and rhetoric while things mire and get worse.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Amen

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Can the US get out of Iraq yet? I mean are they done stealing all the oil there already? I just got done watching 1984. Orwell seems not to have been too many years off with the war that never ends. "Who are we at war with?" "East Asia, we have always been at war with east Asia." GWB must have been paying attention in class for a change when they taught this classic. It's real, and it's now, we're living it!

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

I disagree. Can you provide me the quotes where he said these things in the State of the Union? Seriously. Tell me EXACTLY what he said. If they are so well documented, tell me EXACTLY what he said.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

From [url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html]Whitehouse.gov[/url] - State of the Union Speach 2003: [i] From three Iraqi defectors we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ warfare agents, and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors. Saddam Hussein has not disclosed these facilities. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed them. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide[/i] [We know now the administration knew these reports were false.] [i]Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own.[/i]

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Oh, and by the way, I'm not indignant about anything. I am, like yourself, eager for the truth to come out. Unfortunately, I don't think we can ever get the whole truth from either politicians or the media. But the continual harping of LIE LIE LIE is just mind numbing! So you think Bush lied about WMD's??? [url=http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=10288]Article on WMD's and Iraq.[/url] Then so did UNSCOM, Bill Clinton, the Democratic party, etc. EVERYONE believed that he had WMD's. So now why is Bush lying by stating what everyone else believes to be true? About the nuclear program: Here is the actual quote from the state of the union: 'The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa'. Note that it says the British Government has learned (and they still stand by the assertion), also, it says 'Africa', not Niger. So was this a lie or a reliance on intelligence that might be incorrect? Well, i'm guessing you'll go for the lie lie lie! approach. Amusingly enough, the French intelligence service, the DGSE � the Directorate-General of External Safety, has been fingered as one of the sources that MI6 used in its uranium report. So maybe we should just blame the French (my personal favorite option). Now, I admit that any connection between Saddam and Al Quaida is tenuous at best, although there are known connections earlier in the 90's. However, I DO believe that Saddam supported terrorism in general. This I can't offer up specific proof for. But, I just have a feeling that evil folks out for US blood might have shared agendas and resources. I have stated this before - I'm not sure if anything was a deliberate lie, exagerations in order to gain support, or just reliance on bad intelligence. I do know that of all three, my least favorite is the bad intelligence. This is the most dangerous aspect. My next least favorite is the lies. True, all politicians lie, but lying about life and death matters is serious. Exagerations? It wouldn't be American politics otherwise. I think that there is plenty of evidence supporting the fact that Saddam was a bad guy, was doing bad things and, if left unchecked, would continue to bad things. I also believe that the UN is completely inept and could not find their ass if they hadn't wiped in a month. I think that Saddam did support terrorism in some aspects. I think that what happened needed to be done. Will I vote for Bush? Hell no. Will I vote for a Democrat? Not if forced at gunpoint. Will I ever reach a final conclusion? Yeah, right.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

OK, so which part are the lies? Mobile weapons factories? Well, has it been proven that they didn't exist? The aluminum tubes, yeah, not so sure about this one. But the International Atomic Energy Agency did confirm that Iraq had a program, right? And was there any satisfactory evidence that it was dismantled? Uranium acquisition in Africa - the Brits to this day STILL stand by their assertions. There are contradictory reports to the assertions, true. The Al Quaida link - this one, in my mind is still tenuous. I do think that Saddam supported terrorism in general, though.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Um, OK. No, the US can't get out of Iraq yet, nor do we want to. To pull out now would make the whole effort meaningless and result in Iraq falling under the control of the first dictator able to scrape together enough military support. Crap - it hasn't even been a year! Americans nowadays are absolutely spoiled - they think all things militarily can be done in a couple of months. This just isn't the case.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

bullshit, you can not believe it if you want, but the centrifuge crap (from the state of the union and the "eve of war" speech) and the niger uranium crap and the terrorism crap are lies. now, in order for them to be considered LIES Bush had to know they were NOT TRUE when he said them. and that has been established by several insiders, techinically bush could claim he wasnt aware but its very clear that the administration DID KNOW and since he is in charge its reasonable to assume he knew well and full that these claims were "tenuous" and you put them, bullshit as I put them. if you want more EXACT "TELL ME EXACTLY WHERE" then see my article about exactly where from JUNE: [url=http://www.totsp.com/main.php?storyid=3215]US Intelligence data, fact or fiction?[/url].

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Even though I disagree with the way we engaged on this one I totally agree that we cannot leave now. We cannot leave not not only because it would be stupid and irresponsible, but also illegal. If we can pull a democracy out of this that would be great, I still believe that can happen, although again I do disagree with the means to justify said end. At this point though we cant bail, thats just stupid.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

[i]Saddam was a bad guy, was doing bad things and, if left unchecked, would continue to bad things[/i] Agreed. [i]I also believe that the UN is completely inept and could not find their ass if they hadn't wiped in a month[/i] How can you still say this? It is obvious the UN had at least some positive effort in Iraq or we would have found stuff by now. It seems pretty certain that Sadam was not left in check - he was not free to pursue the things that we all agree he would have like to. That is the current sticking point.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Its funny, everyone loves to talk about how inept the UN is, but one of the really interesting things that has been [url=http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact]point out[/url] recently is the UN and IAEA assesment of the state of Saddam's weapons programs seems to be beating the CIA's "across the board". Yes, even in the State of the Union address where President Bush laid out a laundry list of "evidence" (all of which turned out to have been debunked by the intelligence community before the war), he still glossed over the idea of "imminent threat". The problem with that is, "imminent threat" is the definition by which a preemptive stike is justified by our treaty obligations. Now, the Bush Administration is knee deep in corpses of treaties already, but this is an important point. Without that definition you are giving a mandate to any country who percieves hostile intention and escalating capability from another nation to unilaterally act. That aside, however, the Brushing aside of imminence falls into the patter of language parsing that the administration has become so great at. McClellan won't say that Libby and Rove aren't responsible for Plame, rather he glosses over it with plausibly deniable phrases. Dick Cheny won't say Saddam had anything to do with Sept 11, but he will go on Meet the Press and give a 250 word response that leads you there 6 ways from Sunday. Either the administration knowingly lied, or they are terribly inept. (The article I linked to above seems to opt for the latter explanation) I am not sure which is worse, really.

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

You miss the point. I don't think it should have been done at all! The US has no business toppling other countries, or their leadership. Do unto others ...

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

Ah, good old democracy. The single worst form of government going. So ineffecient any half baked crook can play the system and capitalize on the confusion inherent in it (Dick Cheney anyone?). It's a god damned good thing that it's only a theory, and never practiced in reality. Oh, and sure whip it onto some people that have been under a totalitarian regime of one sort or another since before the dawn of history. Yeah that'll work out. Your post is a shining example of how simple minded most really are. Also, your view expressed is the party line justifying international crime. Keep the faith! Fact Iraq has 30% of the known oil reserves in the world. Fact There is no link between Iraq and terrorists, or WMD. Lets do the math. The *ONLY* reason the US is getting away with what they're getting away with is the democratic society the action stems from is too damned blamed stupid and their leaders can get away with murder! Democracy in action ya gota lub it. Why it's the perfect alabi, a mandate from the people, the will of the masses. Yeah huh?

Re: To those that keep insisting Bush lied

I have to take exception to labeling Democracy as the single worst form of government going. In fact I'm not sure if there has ever been anything better. That said, I do think it's a little naive to think we can just snap our fingers and install a functioning democracy in the Middle East. There is an entire culture mindset that comes into play. I for one, don't see it happening - or should I say lasting more than a decade or two. Honestly, sign me up for nuclear power everywhere [url=http://www.adn.com/front/v-akcom/story/4214182p-4226215c.html]Alaska.com[/url]. I'll take the risks of a few accidents every now and then over this disaster relying on the middle east has become.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.